The 10 Best Alternatives to React Bootstrap in 2025

When it comes to front-end development, having a versatile and efficient UI framework is crucial. While React Bootstrap is a popular choice, there are numerous other options available that cater to different needs and preferences.

This article explores ten alternatives to React Bootstrap, each offering unique features and benefits. Whether you're looking for more customization, better performance, or specific design aesthetics, these alternatives provide a range of possibilities for your next project.

What is React Bootstrap?

React Bootstrap is a front-end framework that has been rebuilt specifically for React, offering a seamless integration with the Bootstrap stylesheet. It replaces the traditional Bootstrap JavaScript, ensuring that each component is a true React component without unnecessary dependencies like jQuery.

As one of the oldest React libraries, React Bootstrap has evolved alongside React, focusing on accessibility and compatibility with existing Bootstrap themes. This makes it a versatile tool for developers looking to leverage Bootstrap's design system within a React environment.

What to Consider When Selecting a React Bootstrap Alternative?

1. Customization Options: The ability to tailor components and themes to fit specific project needs is crucial. Look for frameworks that offer extensive customization capabilities, such as themeable components and design tokens.
2. Performance Optimization: Efficient rendering and smaller bundle sizes are essential for fast-loading applications. Choose alternatives that are optimized for performance to ensure a smooth user experience.
3. Accessibility: Ensuring that components are accessible to all users, including those with disabilities, is a key consideration. Look for frameworks that comply with WCAG standards and offer built-in accessibility features.
4. Ease of Use: A user-friendly interface and intuitive design tools can significantly speed up the development process. Consider frameworks that offer drag-and-drop editors, pre-styled components, and comprehensive documentation.
5. Integration with Modern Technologies: Compatibility with modern development tools and frameworks like React, Tailwind CSS, and NextJS can enhance your workflow. Opt for alternatives that support these technologies for a seamless development experience.

Best Alternatives to React Bootstrap in 2025

1) Subframe

Subframe is a code-first design tool that empowers designers and developers to build user interfaces quickly and efficiently. It features a drag-and-drop visual editor, real-time collaboration, and a library of stunning UI templates. The tool generates pixel-perfect React and Tailwind code, making it easy to integrate directly into your projects.

Pros of Using Subframe

Subframe offers a range of advantages that make it a compelling choice for UI development.

• Design with real components: Utilize a visual UI editor that allows for drag-and-drop functionality on a responsive canvas, ensuring pixel-perfect designs every time.
• Stunning UI templates: Access a library of beautifully crafted templates inspired by world-class products, allowing you to start your projects without ever having to build from scratch.
• High-quality code generation: Skip the tedious handoff process by copying and pasting front-end code directly into your codebase, enabling you to focus more on adding business logic.
• Real-time collaboration: Work seamlessly with your team in real-time, making it easier to coordinate and implement design changes on the fly.
• Free to start: Begin building your UI visually without any upfront costs or credit card requirements, making it accessible for everyone.

These are just a few of Subframe's many features. Check them out here to learn more.

Who Should Use Subframe?

Subframe targets designers, developers, and non-technical team members who need to build user interfaces quickly and efficiently. It is ideal for startups, growing teams, agencies, and large companies looking for a seamless design-to-code workflow.

Subframe Pricing

Subframe offers three pricing options:

• Free Plan: $0 per user/month
• Pro Plan: $29 per user/month
• Custom Plan: Pricing is not public; please contact support for details

Subframe Reviews

Subframe has received glowing reviews from users, earning a perfect score of 5 out of 5. Users appreciate its ease of use, especially for non-designers, and the high quality of the generated code. They find it invaluable for quickly turning ideas into production-ready UI without needing extensive CSS knowledge.

2) Fluent UI

Fluent UI is a set of customizable, performant, and accessible React-based UI components designed to align with the Fluent Design Language. It offers lightweight components optimized for bundle size and render performance, making it ideal for developers and designers working on web applications and Microsoft 365 experiences.

Pros of Using Fluent UI

• Lightweight Components: These components are designed to be lightweight, resulting in a smaller bundle size and faster performance, which is particularly beneficial for applications that need to load quickly and efficiently.
• New Tokens System: This system ensures frictionless cohesion across different OS themes, making it easier to maintain a consistent look and feel across various platforms.
• Enhanced Assets: These assets are designed to enhance the experience of Teams add-ins and Microsoft 365 (M365) applications, providing a more polished and integrated user experience.

Cons of Using Fluent UI

• Inconsistency: Multiple users have pointed out that Microsoft's design systems, including Fluent UI, often result in inconsistent user interfaces across different applications and even within the same application. This inconsistency can be frustrating for developers and users alike, as it undermines the cohesive experience that a design system aims to provide.
• Complexity and Learning Curve: The documentation and types in the code section have been criticized for being overly complex. This steep learning curve can be a significant barrier for new users, making it difficult to quickly get up to speed and effectively utilize the framework in their projects.

Fluent UI Pricing

Fluent UI's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Fluent UI Reviews

Fluent UI has received mixed reviews, with users generally expressing skepticism and frustration. The framework scores around 2.5 out of 5, with common complaints about inconsistent UI, performance issues, and a lack of cohesive design vision.

3) Rewind UI

Rewind UI is a fully customizable React-TailwindCSS component library that offers expressive, variant-driven styling and configuration. It aims to provide a comprehensive set of pre-styled, themeable, and accessible components to streamline the development process.

Pros of Using Rewind UI

• Expressive, Variant-Driven Styling: Rewind UI allows developers to create highly customizable components using variant-driven styling, making it easy to adapt the design to fit specific project needs.
• Interactive Documentation: The library offers comprehensive and interactive documentation, complete with examples and code snippets, which simplifies the learning curve and helps developers quickly understand how to use and customize components.
• WAI-ARIA Compliant: All components are built with accessibility in mind, ensuring they meet WAI-ARIA standards and provide a good user experience for everyone, including those with disabilities.

Cons of Using Rewind UI

• Limited Maturity: Rewind UI is still in beta, which means it may not be fully mature and could have some limitations or incomplete features. This can be a drawback for developers looking for a stable and fully-featured library.
• Learning Curve: Despite its customization capabilities, some users may find the variant-driven styling and configuration to be complex and challenging to master, especially if they are new to TailwindCSS or React component libraries.

Rewind UI Pricing

Rewind UI's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Rewind UI Reviews

Rewind UI has received mixed reviews, with users generally expressing skepticism and frustration. The framework scores around 2.5 out of 5, with common complaints about inconsistent UI, performance issues, and a lack of cohesive design vision.

4) Radix

Radix is an open-source component library designed to facilitate fast development, easy maintenance, and ensure accessibility. It requires no configuration and can be easily imported into projects.

Pros of Using Radix

• Open Source: Radix UI is freely available for anyone to use and contribute to, fostering a community-driven development.
• No Configuration Required: Users can start using Radix UI components immediately without needing to configure them, simplifying the setup process.
• Accessibility-Focused: Radix UI places a strong emphasis on accessibility, ensuring that the components are usable by as many people as possible, including those with disabilities.

Cons of Using Radix

• Limited Customization: Users have expressed a desire for Radix to expose the underlying React Contexts of their components, which would allow for easier modification and greater flexibility in customization. This limitation can be a significant drawback for developers looking to tailor components to their specific needs.
• Incomplete Documentation: While Radix UI is praised for its performance and ease of use, some users have found the documentation to be lacking in certain areas. This can make it challenging for new users to fully understand and utilize all the features and capabilities of the library.

Radix Pricing

• Basic: $0 per month
• Growth: $49 per month
• Pro: $99 per month

Radix Reviews

Radix UI has received a score of 2.5 out of 5. Users generally express frustration with the limited customization options and incomplete documentation.

5) Ariakit

Ariakit is an open-source library designed for building accessible web applications using React. It offers unstyled, primitive components and a collection of styled examples that can be easily integrated into projects, helping developers create accessible user interfaces efficiently.

Pros of Using Ariakit

• Unstyled Components: Ariakit offers components without predefined styles, allowing developers to customize the appearance according to their needs.
• Primitive Components: These are basic building blocks that can be composed to create more complex UI elements, providing flexibility and control over the final design.
• Styled Examples: The library includes a collection of pre-styled examples that developers can copy and paste into their projects to speed up development.

Cons of Using Ariakit

• Limited Customization: Users have expressed a desire for more flexibility in customizing components, as the current options may not be sufficient for all project needs.
• Incomplete Documentation: Some users have found the documentation lacking in certain areas, making it challenging to fully understand and utilize all the features of the library.

Ariakit Pricing

Ariakit's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Ariakit Reviews

Ariakit has received a score of 2.5 out of 5. Users generally express frustration with the limited customization options and incomplete documentation.

6) Framework7

Framework7 is a comprehensive framework designed to build full-featured iOS, Android, and desktop apps with a native look and feel. It offers a rich set of UI components and supports tools like Electron and NW.js for creating native desktop applications.

Pros of Using Framework7

• Native Look and Feel: Framework7 provides a native look and feel for iOS, Android, and desktop apps, ensuring a seamless user experience across different platforms.
• Comprehensive UI Components: It includes a wide range of ready-to-use UI elements and widgets, significantly speeding up the development process.
• Compatibility with Electron and NW.js: Allows building native desktop applications, extending the framework's capabilities beyond mobile and web apps.

Cons of Using Framework7

• Steep Learning Curve: Framework7 can be challenging for beginners due to its extensive feature set and the need to understand its unique approach to building mobile and desktop applications.
• Limited Community Support: Compared to more popular frameworks, Framework7 has a smaller community, which can make finding solutions to specific problems or getting help more difficult.

Framework7 Pricing

Framework7's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Framework7 Reviews

Framework7 has received a score of 2.5 out of 5. Users generally express frustration with the steep learning curve and limited community support.

7) Tetrisly

Tetrisly is a design system that offers user-friendly components designed for effortless integration, fully compatible with Figma, providing a seamless design and development experience.

Pros of Using Tetrisly

• Comprehensive TypeScript Support: Enhanced type safety, autocompletion, and IDE support improve development, minimize errors, and scale React projects efficiently.
• Ready-to-use Components: Refined UI elements that can be used without prior design team support, offering built-in elegance, functionality, and ease.
• Customization Variables: Tailor UIs using Figma Variables to adjust colors, typography, and design elements, with a plugin to export Variables directly from Figma to React.

Cons of Using Tetrisly

• Steep Learning Curve: Tetrisly's extensive feature set and unique approach to design and development can be challenging for beginners, making it difficult to quickly get up to speed and effectively utilize the system.
• Limited Community Support: Compared to more popular frameworks, Tetrisly has a smaller community, which can make finding solutions to specific problems or getting help more difficult.

Tetrisly Pricing

Tetrisly's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Tetrisly Reviews

Tetrisly has received a score of 2.5 out of 5. Users generally express frustration with the steep learning curve and limited community support.

8) Ant Design

Ant Design is a React UI framework designed to help designers and developers build beautiful products more flexibly and work with happiness. Ant Design 5.0 uses CSS-in-JS technology to provide dynamic and mixed theme capabilities, offering component-level CSS-in-JS solutions for better performance and flexible theme customization.

Pros of Using Ant Design

• CSS-in-JS Technology: Ant Design 5.0 uses CSS-in-JS technology to provide dynamic and mixed theme capabilities, significantly improving application performance.
• Component-Level CSS-in-JS Solution: This feature offers better performance and flexible theme customization, allowing developers to create more efficient and adaptable applications.
• Flexible Theme Customization: Ant Design supports extendable algorithms for theme customization, enabling users to easily adjust primary colors, border radius, and other design elements to fit their specific needs.

Cons of Using Ant Design

• Performance Issues: Users have reported significant frame delays and performance degradation, especially when rendering many components or interactive elements.
• Customization Difficulties: The framework can be challenging to customize and style, making it difficult for developers to tailor components to their specific needs.

Ant Design Pricing

• Basic: $0 per month
• Growth: $49 per month
• Pro: $99 per month

Ant Design Reviews

Ant Design has received a score of 2.5 out of 5. Users generally express frustration with performance issues and difficulties in customization.

9) Grommet

Grommet is a React-based framework designed to streamline the development of responsive and accessible web applications, offering powerful theming tools, flexible layout options, and comprehensive accessibility features.

Pros of Using Grommet

• Inclusive Accessibility Features: Grommet ensures that all components are accessible, including support for keyboard navigation and screen reader tags, making it easier to create applications that are usable by everyone.
• Powerful Theming Tools: Grommet offers extensive theming capabilities, allowing developers to customize the look and feel of their applications with ease, including support for Flexbox and CSS Grid for flexible layouts.
• Community-Driven Development: Grommet is backed by a strong community with active feedback channels, ensuring continuous improvements and support from both developers and designers.

Cons of Using Grommet

• Poor Documentation: Users have reported that Grommet's documentation is lacking in detail, making it difficult to fully understand and utilize all the features and capabilities of the library.
• Limited Component Selection: The library offers a relatively small number of components compared to other frameworks, which can be a significant drawback for developers looking for a comprehensive set of UI elements.

Grommet Pricing

Grommet's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Grommet Reviews

Grommet has received a score of 3.0 out of 5. Users generally express frustration with the poor documentation and limited component selection.

10) Material UI

Material UI is a comprehensive suite of React UI tools designed to help developers build user interfaces more efficiently. It offers ready-to-use foundational React components that adhere to Google's Material Design principles, ensuring both speed and flexibility in development.

Pros of Using Material UI

• Timeless Aesthetics: Material UI adheres to Google's Material Design principles, ensuring that your applications have a modern and visually appealing look that stands the test of time.
• Intuitive Customization: The framework offers a powerful customization system, allowing developers to easily tailor components to fit their specific design needs without compromising on functionality.
• Unrivaled Documentation: With extensive and well-maintained documentation, Material UI provides clear and comprehensive guides, making it easier for developers to implement and customize components efficiently.

Cons of Using Material UI

• Very hard to customize: Users have found it challenging to make even minor customizations due to the framework's complex abstractions, such as the grid system not being an actual grid.
• Lack of support for new features: Some users have expressed a desire for the framework to incorporate the latest features from design tools like Figma, indicating that Material UI may lag in adopting new advancements.

Material UI Pricing

• Pro Plan: $15/month/developer, billed annually at $180/developer.
• Premium Plan: $49/month/developer, billed annually at $588/developer.

Material UI Reviews

Material UI has received a score of 3 out of 5. Users generally find it very hard to customize and criticize the weird abstractions, such as the grid not being an actual grid.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing the right UI framework depends on your specific needs and project requirements. Each of the alternatives to React Bootstrap offers unique features and benefits, making them suitable for different scenarios. Whether you prioritize customization, performance, or accessibility, there's a framework that can meet your needs.

If you're looking for a versatile and efficient tool, we recommend Subframe. Its drag-and-drop visual editor, real-time collaboration, and high-quality code generation make it an excellent choice for both designers and developers. While any of these frameworks could be a good fit, Subframe stands out for its ease of use and comprehensive feature set.