The 10 Best Alternatives to PrimeReact in 2025

When it comes to building user interfaces in React, developers have a plethora of component libraries to choose from. While PrimeReact is a popular option, there are numerous alternatives that offer unique features and capabilities.

This article explores ten different libraries that can serve as viable substitutes for PrimeReact. Each alternative brings its own strengths to the table, catering to various project needs and developer preferences.

What is PrimeReact?

PrimeReact is a comprehensive UI component library for React.js, offering a wide range of customizable, feature-rich components to enhance web applications. It is designed to provide developers with the tools they need to create sophisticated user interfaces efficiently.

Some of the features include over 80 UI components, options for styled or unstyled themes, and full support for Typescript. Additionally, PrimeReact is optimized for responsive design and touch elements, ensuring accessibility and enterprise-level support.

What to Consider When Selecting a PrimeReact Alternative?

1. Customization Options: Look for libraries that offer extensive customization capabilities, allowing you to tailor components to fit your specific design needs.
2. Accessibility Compliance: Ensure the library adheres to WCAG and WAI-ARIA standards to make your application accessible to all users, including those with disabilities.
3. Community Support: A strong community can provide valuable resources, such as forums, documentation, and third-party plugins, which can be crucial for troubleshooting and extending functionality.
4. Performance and Scalability: Choose a library optimized for performance and scalability, ensuring it can handle growing user bases and complex applications without compromising speed.
5. Integration Capabilities: Verify that the library can easily integrate with other tools and frameworks you are using, such as Tailwind CSS, TypeScript, or Next.js, to streamline your development process.

Best Alternatives to PrimeReact in 2025

1) Subframe

Subframe is a visual UI editor that empowers designers and developers to create pixel-perfect user interfaces with ease. Featuring a drag-and-drop editor, real-time collaboration, and responsive design capabilities, Subframe generates high-quality front-end code that seamlessly integrates into any codebase.

Pros of Using Subframe

Subframe offers a range of features that make it a compelling choice for developers and designers alike.

• Design with real components: Subframe allows you to drag-and-drop on an intuitive, responsive canvas, ensuring pixel-perfect UI every time.
• Stunning UI templates: Inspired by world-class products and hand-crafted by designers, Subframe provides reusable components so you never have to start from scratch.
• High-quality code: Skip the handoff process by copying and pasting front-end code directly into your codebase, allowing you to focus on adding business logic.
• Free UI building: Start building visually without any upfront costs or credit card requirements.
• Real-time collaboration: Work seamlessly with your team in real-time, enhancing productivity and ensuring everyone is on the same page.

These are just a few of Subframe's many features. Check them out here to learn more.

Who Should Use Subframe?

Subframe primarily targets founders, designers, and developers who need to build user interfaces quickly and efficiently. It is also ideal for startups, agencies, and large companies with custom needs, offering a versatile tool that bridges the gap between design and development.

Subframe Pricing

Subframe offers three pricing options:

• Free: $0 per user/month
• Pro: $29 per user/month
• Custom: Contact support for pricing

Subframe Reviews

Subframe has received a stellar rating of 5 out of 5 on Product Hunt. Users are particularly impressed with its ease of use, especially for non-designers, and the high quality of the generated code. They find it invaluable for quickly turning ideas into production-ready UI without needing extensive CSS knowledge.

Here are some of the positive comments from users:

• Dakota: "I love how easy this is to get started, especially with templates."
• Konstantinos Christoforou: "Great, congratulations on launch! Supported."
• Dominic Whyte: "Having used both, I could not recommend Subframe more highly. It's a) way faster to build interfaces in Subframe and b) Quality of the generated Tailwind is much higher c) much better for product UI (vs. just marketing pages)."
• Germán Merlo: "Hey Irvin! This is awesome. Turning ideas into code is one of the most critical tasks I've ever had. Subframe is super useful and user-friendly. Glad to see you addressing something so challenging. Keep on that way my friend. All the best!"
• Aris Nakos: "Now this I like. Congratulations. Finally something that's not just a mockup. Would give you 5 upvotes, if I could!"

2) Ant Design

Ant Design is a popular React UI framework designed to help designers and developers build beautiful products more flexibly and with greater happiness. The latest version, Ant Design 5.0, uses CSS-in-JS technology to provide dynamic and mixed theme capabilities, enhancing application performance.

Pros of Using Ant Design

• CSS-in-JS Technology: Ant Design 5.0 uses CSS-in-JS technology, allowing for dynamic and mixed theme capabilities, which means themes can be changed and mixed dynamically, providing greater flexibility and customization options.
• Component-Level CSS-in-JS: This feature ensures that each component has its own CSS-in-JS solution, improving the performance of the application by reducing the scope of CSS and making it more efficient.
• Flexible Theme Customization: The framework allows for extendable algorithms, making it easier to customize themes. Users can choose from various predefined themes or create their own by adjusting primary colors, border radius, and compact settings.

Cons of Using Ant Design

• Performance Issues: Users have reported significant performance degradation when rendering many components simultaneously. For instance, the popover component can cause massive slowdowns by rendering a unique portal element for every dot on a map, regardless of whether it is open or not.
• Customization Difficulties: Customizing and styling components can be challenging. Some users find the framework tedious to work with, especially for forms, and the extensive documentation required suggests a steep learning curve.

Ant Design Pricing

Ant Design's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Ant Design Reviews

Ant Design has received mixed reviews from users, with a general score of 3 out of 5. Users frequently mention performance issues, particularly when rendering many components, and difficulties with documentation, especially the lack of English translations.

3) DaisyUI

DaisyUI is a component library for Tailwind CSS that enhances development speed by providing pre-defined component class names, resulting in cleaner HTML and easier customization. It is a pure CSS solution that works across all frameworks without requiring JavaScript dependencies.

Pros of Using DaisyUI

• Pure CSS with no JS dependency: DaisyUI operates entirely on CSS, eliminating the need for JavaScript dependencies, which simplifies integration and enhances performance.
• Reduces the number of class names by 80%: By adding component class names to Tailwind CSS, DaisyUI significantly minimizes the number of class names required, resulting in cleaner and more maintainable HTML.
• Unlimited themes with zero effort: DaisyUI offers a vast array of themes that can be effortlessly applied using CSS variables, allowing for extensive customization without additional coding.

Cons of Using DaisyUI

• Limited Customization Options: While DaisyUI offers a variety of themes, some users find the customization options limited compared to other libraries. This can be a drawback for developers looking for highly tailored design solutions.
• Dependency on Tailwind CSS: DaisyUI is built specifically for Tailwind CSS, which means it may not be suitable for projects that do not use Tailwind. This dependency can limit its applicability in diverse development environments.

DaisyUI Pricing

• Business Plan: $49 per user/month
• Enterprise Plan: $99 per user/month
• Custom Plan: Contact support for pricing

DaisyUI Reviews

DaisyUI has an overall rating of 4.9 out of 5 based on 20 reviews. Users generally mention that it is a time-saver and integrates well with various frameworks.

4) Reshaped

Reshaped is a design system that provides accessible React components for building high-quality products or starting your own design system. It is designed to be flexible and easy to use, with a focus on theming and dark mode support.

Pros of Using Reshaped

• Theming and Dark Mode: Reshaped themes are powered by semantic CSS variables, eliminating the need for additional CSS libraries. It includes a CLI for creating themes and supports automatic dark mode.
• TailwindCSS Integration: Provides a single-line configuration to access all Reshaped design tokens with Tailwind classnames and intellisense, making it easy to use TailwindCSS with Reshaped.
• Completely Accessible: All components are WCAG and WAI-ARIA compliant, ensuring that products built with Reshaped are accessible to everyone, including those using screen readers.

Cons of Using Reshaped

• Limited Customization Options: While Reshaped offers a variety of themes and components, some users find the customization options limited compared to other libraries. This can be a drawback for developers looking for highly tailored design solutions.
• Dependency on Tailwind CSS: Reshaped is built specifically for Tailwind CSS, which means it may not be suitable for projects that do not use Tailwind. This dependency can limit its applicability in diverse development environments.

Reshaped Pricing

• Design License: $89
• Pro License: $999
• Enterprise License: Contact us

Reshaped Reviews

Reshaped has an overall rating of 3.5 out of 5. Users generally mention that while the theming architecture is robust, the customization options are limited, and the dependency on Tailwind CSS can be restrictive for some projects.

5) Radix

Radix is an open-source component library designed for fast development, easy maintenance, and accessibility, requiring no configuration and ready for immediate use by simply importing the necessary components.

Pros of Using Radix

• Pre-configured Components: Radix offers ready-to-use components that require no configuration, allowing developers to start building immediately without any setup hassle.
• High Accessibility Standards: All components are designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring compliance with WCAG and WAI-ARIA standards, making your applications usable by everyone.
• Open-Source and Community-Driven: Being open-source, Radix benefits from community contributions, which continuously improve and expand the library, providing a robust and evolving toolset.

Cons of Using Radix

• Lack of Exposed React Contexts: One user mentioned a desire for Radix to expose the underlying React Contexts of their components for easier modification, which can be a limitation for developers looking for more control over component behavior.
• Limited Customization Options: While Radix UI is praised for its ease of use and accessibility, some users find the customization options limited, particularly when it comes to modifying the internal workings of components.

Radix Pricing

• Basic: $0 per month
• Growth: $49 per month
• Pro: $99 per month

Radix Reviews

Radix has an overall rating of 5 out of 5 based on 16 reviews. Users generally mention that while the toolkit is highly appreciated, there is room for improvement in terms of flexibility and customization at a deeper level.

6) Material UI

Material UI is a comprehensive suite of React UI tools designed to help developers build user interfaces more efficiently, offering foundational components that implement Google's Material Design and can be customized to fit any design system.

Pros of Using Material UI

• Timeless aesthetics: Build beautiful UIs with ease using Google's Material Design or create your own sophisticated theme.
• Intuitive customization: Full control over how components look and behave.
• Unrivaled documentation: Extensive documentation with contributions from over 2,000 contributors.

Cons of Using Material UI

• Hard to Customize: Users have reported that Material UI is very hard to customize, even for minor adjustments, which can be frustrating for developers looking for flexibility.
• Weird Abstractions: The framework has been criticized for its confusing abstractions, such as the grid not being an actual grid, making it less intuitive to work with.

Material UI Pricing

Material UI's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Material UI Reviews

Material UI has an overall rating of 4 out of 5 based on 4 reviews. Users generally find it hard to customize and have issues with certain abstractions, such as the grid not being an actual grid.

7) Park UI

Park UI is a beautifully designed component library built with Ark UI and Panda CSS, offering compatibility with multiple JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Solid to help users build their own design systems.

Pros of Using Park UI

• Framework Integration: Park UI supports React, Solid, and Vue, allowing developers to choose their preferred framework for maximum flexibility.
• Customization Options: Users can easily customize UI components' font family, colors, and border radius, and integrate these customizations seamlessly into their projects.
• Figma Kit: A dedicated Figma Kit helps designers create and maintain a consistent design system, streamlining the design-to-development workflow.

Cons of Using Park UI

• Limited to Specific Frameworks: Park UI is only compatible with React, Solid, and Vue, which can be restrictive for projects that use other JavaScript frameworks or libraries.
• Complex Customization Process: The need to manually copy and paste configuration code into `panda.config.ts` can be cumbersome and technical, making it less user-friendly for developers who prefer a more streamlined setup.

Park UI Pricing

• Starter Plan: $19/month

Park UI's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Park UI Reviews

Park UI has an overall rating of 2.5 out of 5 based on user reviews. Users generally mention that the customization process is cumbersome and the framework compatibility is limited.

8) NextUI

NextUI is a React UI library designed to help developers create beautiful, fast, and modern web applications, emphasizing accessibility, customization, and a seamless developer experience.

Pros of Using NextUI

• Themeable: Allows customization of default themes or creation of new themes using a TailwindCSS plugin.
• Automatic Light & Dark UI: Automatically switches themes based on HTML theme prop changes, providing seamless dark mode support.
• Unique Developer Experience (DX): Fully-typed API to minimize the learning curve and enhance the developer experience.

Cons of Using NextUI

• Limited Compatibility with Complex Components: While many components work in React server components, more complex components are limited to client components, which can restrict the flexibility and scalability of your application.
• Customization Challenges: Users have reported difficulties in customizing components to fit specific design needs, which can be a significant drawback for developers seeking highly tailored solutions.

NextUI Pricing

• Solo Plan: $249 (one-time payment plus local taxes)
• Startup Plan: $399 (one-time payment plus local taxes)
• Organization Plan: $799 (one-time payment plus local taxes)

NextUI Reviews

NextUI has an overall rating of 4.8 out of 5 based on 15 reviews. Users generally mention that while the library offers a unique developer experience, there are challenges with customizing components to fit specific design needs.

9) Headless UI

Headless UI offers a collection of unstyled and fully accessible UI components that are designed to work seamlessly with Tailwind CSS. The components are available for React and Vue frameworks, providing flexibility and ease of integration for developers.

Pros of Using Headless UI

• Completely Unstyled Components: Headless UI provides components without any pre-defined styles, giving developers the freedom to apply their own custom styles and ensuring that the design remains consistent with their project's unique aesthetic.
• Fully Accessible by Default: All components are designed with accessibility in mind, ensuring compliance with WCAG and WAI-ARIA standards. This makes it easier to create applications that are usable by everyone, including those with disabilities.
• Seamless Integration with Tailwind CSS: Headless UI components are designed to work effortlessly with Tailwind CSS, allowing developers to leverage the utility-first CSS framework for rapid and efficient styling.

Cons of Using Headless UI

• Steep Learning Curve: Users have reported that integrating Headless UI with existing projects can be challenging, especially for those who are not familiar with Tailwind CSS. The lack of pre-defined styles means developers need to invest additional time and effort to style components from scratch.
• Limited Documentation: While Headless UI offers a range of components, some users find the documentation insufficient for more complex use cases. This can lead to difficulties in implementation and troubleshooting, particularly for developers who are new to the library.

Headless UI Pricing

Headless UI's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Headless UI Reviews

Headless UI has an overall rating of 2.5 out of 5 based on user reviews. Users generally mention that integrating Headless UI with existing projects can be challenging, and the documentation is insufficient for more complex use cases.

10) Relume

Relume is a React UI library featuring over 1,400 components built with Tailwind CSS, designed to streamline web development and enhance productivity for developers and designers.

Pros of Using Relume

• Extensive Component Library: Relume offers over 1,400 React components built with Tailwind CSS, providing a vast array of options for developers to choose from, ensuring that almost any UI need can be met.
• AI Site Builder: The AI Site Builder feature allows users to create a fully functional website in under 5 minutes, significantly reducing development time and effort.
• Relume Figma Kit: The included Figma Kit complements the React components, enabling a seamless design-to-development workflow and ensuring consistency across design and code.

Cons of Using Relume

• Steep Learning Curve: Users have reported that integrating Relume with existing projects can be challenging, especially for those who are not familiar with Tailwind CSS. The lack of pre-defined styles means developers need to invest additional time and effort to style components from scratch.
• Limited Documentation: While Relume offers a range of components, some users find the documentation insufficient for more complex use cases. This can lead to difficulties in implementation and troubleshooting, particularly for developers who are new to the library.

Relume Pricing

• Free Plan: $0 USD per month for one person
• Starter Plan: $18 USD per month for one person
• Pro Plan: $40 USD per month for one person
• Team Plan: $36 USD per month per person (minimum 3 people)

Relume Reviews

Relume has an overall rating of 2.5 out of 5 based on user reviews. Users generally mention that integrating Relume with existing projects can be challenging, and the documentation is insufficient for more complex use cases.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing the right UI component library depends on your specific needs and preferences. Each of the alternatives mentioned offers unique features and capabilities that can cater to different project requirements. Whether you prioritize customization, accessibility, or performance, there's a library that fits your criteria.

If you're looking for a versatile and user-friendly option, we recommend Subframe. Its drag-and-drop editor, real-time collaboration, and high-quality code generation make it an excellent choice for developers and designers alike. While all the alternatives have their strengths, Subframe stands out for its ease of use and efficiency in building pixel-perfect user interfaces.