The 10 Best Alternatives to Framework7 in 2025

When it comes to mobile app development, having the right framework can make all the difference. While Framework7 is a popular choice, there are numerous other options available that might better suit your needs.

This article explores ten alternatives to Framework7, each offering unique features and capabilities. Whether you're looking for something more lightweight or a framework with a different set of tools, we've got you covered.

What is Framework7?

Framework7 is a comprehensive framework designed for building mobile, desktop, and web applications with a native look and feel. It offers a wide range of UI components and supports popular JavaScript frameworks like Vue.js, React, and Svelte.

The framework is flexible, allowing developers to use plain HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It also provides tools for creating web apps, PWAs, and native desktop apps when paired with Electron or NW.js.

What to Consider When Selecting a Framework7 Alternative?

1. Customization Options: Look for frameworks that offer extensive customization capabilities, allowing you to tailor the UI components to fit your specific design needs.
2. Integration Capabilities: Ensure the framework can easily integrate with other tools and technologies you are already using, such as React, Vue, or Tailwind CSS.
3. Community Support: A strong community can provide valuable resources, plugins, and support, making it easier to troubleshoot issues and find solutions.
4. Performance: Evaluate the performance metrics of the framework to ensure it can handle the demands of your application efficiently.
5. Documentation Quality: Comprehensive and clear documentation is crucial for quick onboarding and effective use of the framework's features.

Best Alternatives to Framework7 in 2025

1) Subframe

Subframe is a visual UI editor that empowers designers and developers to create pixel-perfect user interfaces using a drag-and-drop editor. It supports real-time collaboration and responsive design, offering 100s of UI templates, pre-built components, and AI-powered design features. The tool seamlessly integrates with technologies like React, Tailwind CSS, NextJS, and Vite, allowing users to copy and paste front-end code directly into their codebase.

Pros of Using Subframe

Subframe offers a range of advantages that make it a standout choice for UI development.

• Design with real components: Subframe allows you to create pixel-perfect user interfaces using a drag-and-drop editor, making it a favorite among designers and developers.
• Stunning UI templates: The platform provides a variety of beautifully crafted templates inspired by world-class products, ensuring you never have to start from scratch.
• High-quality code: You can copy and paste front-end code directly into your codebase, allowing you to focus more on building and less on pixel-pushing CSS.
• Start building UI visually for free: Subframe offers a free tier to get you started without requiring a credit card.
• Real-time collaboration: The tool supports real-time collaboration, making it easier for teams to work together seamlessly.

These are just a few of Subframe's many features. Check them out here to learn more.

Who Should Use Subframe?

Subframe targets a diverse range of users, including founders, designers, developers, freelancers, and non-technical team members. It is particularly beneficial for startups, growing teams, agencies, and large companies with custom needs, offering a seamless bridge between design and development.

Subframe Pricing

Subframe offers three pricing packages:

• Free: $0 per user/month
• Pro: $29 per user/month
• Custom: Requires contacting support

Subframe Reviews

Subframe has received glowing reviews from users, earning a perfect score of 5 out of 5. Users appreciate its ease of use, especially for non-designers, and the high quality of the generated code. They find it to be a significant improvement over other tools like Figma and Framer, particularly for building actual product UIs rather than just marketing pages.

Here are some of the positive comments from users:

• Dakota: "I love how easy this is to get started, especially with templates."
• Konstantinos Christoforou: "Great, congratulations on launch! Supported."
• Dominic Whyte: "Having used both, I could not recommend Subframe more highly. It's a) way faster to build interfaces in Subframe and b) Quality of the generated Tailwind is much higher c) much better for product UI (vs. just marketing pages)."
• Germán Merlo: "Hey Irvin! This is awesome. Turning ideas into code is one of the most critical tasks I've ever had. Subframe is super useful and user-friendly. Glad to see you addressing something so challenging. Keep on that way my friend. All the best!"
• Aris Nakos: "Now this I like. Congratulations. Finally something that's not just a mockup. Would give you 5 upvotes, if I could!"

2) Blueprint

Blueprint is a React-based UI toolkit designed to provide a comprehensive set of components for building web applications. Developed by Palantir, this open-source project offers extensive documentation and a GitHub repository to support developers in creating robust and scalable web interfaces.

Pros of Using Blueprint

• Comprehensive Component Library: Blueprint offers a wide range of pre-built components, making it easier for developers to create complex web applications without having to build everything from scratch.
• Highly Customizable: The toolkit allows for extensive customization, enabling developers to tailor the components to fit the specific needs and design requirements of their projects.
• Robust Documentation: Blueprint provides thorough and well-organized documentation, which helps developers quickly understand how to use the components and integrate them into their applications effectively.

Cons of Using Blueprint

• Steep Learning Curve: Blueprint's extensive component library and customization options can be overwhelming for new users, requiring a significant time investment to master.
• Limited Design Flexibility: While highly customizable, Blueprint's design system can sometimes feel restrictive, making it challenging to deviate from its default styles and themes.

Blueprint Pricing

Blueprint's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Blueprint Reviews

Blueprint has a score of 0 out of 5 based on the available reviews. Users have not provided any feedback about the company.

3) Rewind UI

Rewind UI is a fully customizable React-TailwindCSS component library that offers expressive, variant-driven styling and configuration, featuring pre-styled components, a themeable system, accessibility features, and interactive documentation.

Pros of Using Rewind UI

• Pre-styled Components: Rewind-UI offers a collection of pre-styled components that can be used directly out of the box, allowing developers to quickly set up their projects without spending too much time on styling.
• Themeable Styling System: Utilizing the CVA library, Rewind-UI provides a themeable styling system, enabling developers to easily customize the look and feel of their components to fit various design systems and branding requirements.
• Accessibility Compliance: Designed with accessibility in mind, all components in Rewind-UI are WAI-ARIA compliant and follow best practices for accessibility, including support for keyboard interactions, making the library suitable for building inclusive web applications.

Cons of Using Rewind UI

• Steep Learning Curve: Rewind UI's extensive customization options and variant-driven styling can be overwhelming for new users, requiring a significant time investment to master.
• Limited Component Variety: While Rewind UI offers a range of pre-styled components, it may not have the breadth of components available in more mature libraries, potentially limiting its utility for complex projects.

Rewind UI Pricing

Rewind UI's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Rewind UI Reviews

Rewind UI has a score of 0 out of 5 based on the available reviews. Users have not provided any feedback about the company.

4) Carbon Design

Carbon Design is IBM’s open-source design system that offers a comprehensive collection of reusable components, design tools, and resources to help designers and developers create consistent and high-quality user interfaces and digital experiences.

Pros of Using Carbon Design

• IBM Design Language Foundation: Ensures that all components and guidelines are consistent with IBM’s design principles, providing a cohesive user experience.
• Comprehensive Documentation: Detailed guidelines and resources for designing, developing, and migrating, making it easier for users to get started and implement the design system.
• Accessibility Focus: Provides specific guidelines to ensure that all components and designs are accessible to all users, including those with disabilities.

Cons of Using Carbon Design

• Complex Documentation: The documentation for Carbon Design is often considered complex and difficult to navigate, making it challenging for developers to quickly find the information they need.
• Slow SCSS Compilation: SCSS compilation on save can take nearly 10 seconds, which can be frustrating and slow down the development process significantly.

Carbon Design Pricing

Carbon Design's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Carbon Design Reviews

Carbon Design has a score of 0 out of 5 based on the available reviews. Users generally find the system to be more of a component library than a CSS framework, with significant work needed to make it theme-friendly. The layout system is considered lacking, and the documentation, although visually appealing, is complex and difficult to navigate.

5) DaisyUI

DaisyUI is a component library for Tailwind CSS that enhances the framework by adding pre-built component class names, enabling faster and more efficient website development. It is highly customizable, works with all JavaScript frameworks, and does not require any JavaScript dependencies.

Pros of Using DaisyUI

• Component Class Names: Adds semantic component class names to Tailwind CSS, such as btn, card, and toggle, simplifying the styling of common UI components.
• Semantic Colors: Provides a set of semantic color names like primary, secondary, accent, and neutral, which use CSS variables for their values, supporting Dark Mode and other themes without adding new class names.
• Unlimited Themes: Allows users to create and apply custom themes effortlessly, providing a consistent look and feel across different projects.

Cons of Using DaisyUI

• Dependency on Tailwind CSS: Users must be familiar with Tailwind CSS to fully utilize DaisyUI, which can be a barrier for those not already using the framework.
• Limited to CSS: As DaisyUI is a pure CSS solution, it might not cover all use cases that require JavaScript, potentially limiting its functionality for more complex projects.

DaisyUI Pricing

DaisyUI's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

DaisyUI Reviews

DaisyUI has a score of 4.9 out of 5 based on 20 reviews. Users generally find it easy to install and use, and it saves them significant time in UI development.

6) Tetrisly

Tetrisly is a design system that offers user-friendly components designed for effortless integration, fully compatible with Tetrisly for Figma, providing a seamless design and development experience.

Pros of Using Tetrisly

• Seamless Integration with Figma: Tetrisly offers a unique ability to export design tokens directly from Figma to React, ensuring a smooth transition from design to development.
• Comprehensive TypeScript Support: Enhanced type safety, autocompletion, and IDE support improve the development process and minimize errors.
• Customization Variables: Effortlessly tailor UI elements by adjusting colors, typography, and design components using Figma Variables, streamlining the design process.

Cons of Using Tetrisly

• Limited Component Variety: While Tetrisly offers a range of pre-packaged components, it may not have the breadth of components available in more mature libraries, potentially limiting its utility for complex projects.
• Steep Learning Curve: The extensive customization options and integration capabilities can be overwhelming for new users, requiring a significant time investment to master.

Tetrisly Pricing

Tetrisly's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Tetrisly Reviews

Tetrisly has a score of 4.98 out of 5 based on user reviews. Users generally find the product to be well-organized and appreciate its naming conventions and value for money.

7) Grommet

Grommet is a React-based framework designed to streamline the development of responsive and accessible web applications, offering a comprehensive component library that supports mobile-first projects and includes tools for theming and flexible layouts.

Pros of Using Grommet

• Accessibility Support: Grommet includes features like keyboard navigation and screen reader tags, ensuring compliance with WCAG 2.1 standards.
• Powerful Theming Tools: Allows customization of the component library to align with specific color schemes, typography, and layout requirements.
• Flexible Layouts: Utilizes Flexbox and CSS Grid to create adaptable layouts for various devices, from mobile phones to widescreen displays.

Cons of Using Grommet

• Poor Documentation: Users have reported that Grommet's documentation is lacking in detail and clarity, making it difficult for developers to fully understand and utilize the framework's features.
• Limited Component Selection: Grommet offers a relatively small selection of pre-built components compared to other more mature libraries, which can limit its utility for complex projects.

Grommet Pricing

Grommet's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Grommet Reviews

Grommet has a score of 3.0 out of 5 based on user reviews. Users generally mention that it has poor documentation, a limited component selection, and is a fairly new library with room for improvement.

8) Material UI

Material UI is a comprehensive suite of free UI tools designed to help developers ship new features faster, offering fully-loaded component libraries and the ability to integrate custom design systems.

Pros of Using Material UI

• Timeless Aesthetics: Start with Google's Material Design or create custom themes to ensure your application looks modern and professional.
• Intuitive Customization: Full control over component appearance and behavior, allowing you to tailor the UI to your specific needs.
• Comprehensive Documentation: Extensive and well-organized resources contributed by over 2,000 contributors, making it easier to implement and troubleshoot.

Cons of Using Material UI

• Very hard to customize: Users often find it challenging to customize Material UI components, even for minor adjustments. The framework's abstractions, such as the grid system, can be confusing and not intuitive, making it difficult to achieve the desired look and feel without significant effort.
• Issues with integration or compatibility: While Material UI is designed for React, users have expressed a desire for broader compatibility with other Single Page Application frameworks. This limitation can be a significant drawback for developers working in diverse tech stacks.

Material UI Pricing

• Community: $0 (Free forever)
• Pro: $15 per month per developer, billed annually at $180 per developer
• Premium: $49 per month per developer, billed annually at $588 per developer

Material UI Reviews

Material UI has a score of 3 out of 5 based on user reviews. Users generally find it hard to customize and criticize its abstractions, such as the grid system not being an actual grid.

9) Ant Design

Ant Design is a popular React UI framework designed to help designers and developers build beautiful products more flexibly and work with happiness. It provides a comprehensive suite of UI components and tools for building web applications, supporting flexible theme customization, rich components, and a robust design framework.

Pros of Using Ant Design

• Dynamic and Mixed Theme Capabilities: Utilizes CSS-in-JS technology to enable dynamic and mixed theme capabilities, allowing for more flexible and responsive design adjustments.
• Component-Level CSS-in-JS Solution: Enhances performance by applying CSS-in-JS at the component level, ensuring faster and more efficient rendering of styles.
• Extendable Theme Customization: Offers an extendable algorithm for easier and more flexible custom theme creation, making it simple to adapt the design to various branding requirements.

Cons of Using Ant Design

• Performance Issues: Users have reported significant performance problems, especially when rendering many components. This can lead to delays and a sluggish user experience, making it challenging to build high-performance applications.
• Customization Difficulties: Ant Design can be difficult to customize and style according to specific project needs. The framework's extensive use of CSS-in-JS and predefined styles can make it cumbersome to implement unique designs and themes.

Ant Design Pricing

Ant Design's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Ant Design Reviews

Ant Design has a score of 2 out of 5 based on user reviews. Users generally mention performance issues when rendering many components and difficulties with customization and documentation, particularly the Chinese-only documentation.

10) Park UI

Park UI is a UI component framework that offers beautifully designed components built with Ark UI and Panda CSS, compatible with various JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Solid.

Pros of Using Park UI

• Multi-Framework Support: Compatible with React, Vue, and Solid, making it versatile for various projects.
• Integration with Panda CSS: Ensures a consistent and modern design by leveraging Panda CSS for styling.
• Figma Kit: Provides a Figma kit for seamless collaboration between designers and developers, ensuring design consistency.

Cons of Using Park UI

• Limited Component Variety: While Park UI offers a range of pre-packaged components, it may not have the breadth of components available in more mature libraries, potentially limiting its utility for complex projects.
• Steep Learning Curve: The extensive customization options and integration capabilities can be overwhelming for new users, requiring a significant time investment to master.

Park UI Pricing

Park UI's pricing is not public. Contact their support for more info.

Park UI Reviews

Park UI has a score of 2 out of 5 based on user reviews. Users generally mention performance issues and difficulties with customization and documentation.

Which One Should You Go With?

Choosing the right framework for your project can be a daunting task, but any of the options listed above would be a solid choice. Each framework offers unique features and capabilities that cater to different needs and preferences, ensuring you can find the perfect fit for your development goals.

If you're looking for a versatile and user-friendly alternative, we recommend Subframe. With its drag-and-drop visual editor, real-time collaboration, and high-quality code, Subframe stands out as a top choice for both designers and developers. Explore the possibilities and see how Subframe can elevate your next project.